Skip to content
Microgrid Web
MICROGRID SIMULATION & ENGINEERING

Model your microgrid. Understand every kilowatt.

Evaluate solar, battery storage and diesel generation together. Compare dispatch strategies, estimate fuel use and turn hourly profiles into engineering-ready reports.

Built for engineering workflows: hourly profiles, dispatch comparisons and transparent assumptions.

PROJECT / ISLAND RESORT HYBRID
Annual simulation overview
REPORT PREVIEW
Estimated fuel reduction37.52%vs. diesel-only baseline
PV energy879.8 MWhannual model output
Hybrid fuel use325.6k L/yrmodeled scenario
Unserved energy0 kWhin this modeled case
Illustrative dispatch profilePV · BESS · Diesel
00:0006:0012:0018:0024:00
PV outputBattery dispatchDiesel generation
A result you can inspect

Move beyond guesswork. Compare complete energy systems.

Use one consistent load profile to compare a diesel-only baseline with a solar-and-storage hybrid scenario. Review the energy, fuel and operating implications together.

Annual fuel reduction37.52%From one example simulation report
Fuel saved195,553 LEstimated per year in that scenario
Annual load energy1,698.7 MWhInput profile energy in the example
Battery capacity1.0 MWhConfigured BESS energy capacity

Example figures are taken from a single modeled case and are not a performance guarantee. Results depend on the load profile, weather/PV input, generator fuel curves, equipment limits and dispatch settings. The public example is anonymized.

Baseline vs. hybrid

Quantify the difference your design makes.

The simulator report compares annual fuel use for the configured diesel-only and hybrid cases, helping engineers communicate trade-offs with clear assumptions.

REFERENCE CASE

Diesel-only plant

521,191 L/yr
Baseline annual fuel consumption
Relative fuel use100%

The reference report configured three 500 kVA diesel generator sets in each case, with a 423.2 kW peak PV array and 500 kW / 1,000 kWh BESS in the hybrid case. The numbers describe that study only.

Engineering analytics

See the operating story behind the annual totals.

Annual energy and fuel totals are only the start. Review dispatch behavior, battery cycling and generator duty to identify questions that need engineering attention.

↗

Energy balance

Compare load, PV generation, generator output, battery charge/discharge and curtailed or dumped energy.

◷

Diesel fuel & runtime

Review annual fuel use, generator unit-hours, starts, loading and per-genset operating distribution.

▥

Battery performance

Inspect state of charge, annual throughput, equivalent full cycles and monthly charge/discharge trends.

⌁

Dispatch strategy

Evaluate generator online logic, minimum loading, battery SOC thresholds and cycle-charging behavior.

◎

Peak-load review

Find peak load and generation periods, check equipment limits and review overload or unserved-energy indicators.

✓

Assumptions made visible

Keep the selected profile, equipment ratings and dispatch assumptions beside the results so comparisons remain traceable.

A practical workflow

From load data to a defensible comparison.

Organize the study around the project inputs engineers already work with: demand profiles, equipment configurations and dispatch assumptions.

STEP 01

Define the project

Set project details and import the hourly load profile. Check the date range, interval count and scaling assumptions.

STEP 02

Configure the plant

Enter PV capacity, BESS power and energy, generator ratings, minimum loading and operating strategy.

STEP 03

Run & compare

Compare the reference case with the hybrid design, then inspect fuel, energy, runtime and reliability indicators.

STEP 04

Export the report

Present key findings, configuration details, monthly trends, duty summaries, limitations and technical appendices.

Report-ready results

Make technical results easier to review and share.

The example report includes an executive summary, baseline/hybrid comparison, annual energy and fuel results, BESS throughput and SOC, monthly charts, peak-load analysis and a technical appendix.

  • Executive summary and study basis
  • Annual fuel, energy and runtime comparisons
  • Battery throughput, cycles and SOC analysis
  • Per-generator duty and operating diagnostics
  • Assumptions, sensitivity notes and technical appendix

Before publishing a client report publicly, remove client identifiers and confirm permission to share the underlying project data.

Designed for real projects

Explore the questions that matter to your site.

A simulation workflow can support early-stage engineering and scenario comparison for a range of remote and hybrid power applications.

Island & remote resorts

Study solar contribution, storage dispatch and diesel fuel dependence across seasonal demand.

Industrial facilities

Compare generation configurations against measured or forecast operating profiles.

Telecom & remote sites

Explore storage autonomy, generator runtime and PV contribution for isolated loads.

EPC & project development

Prepare transparent design comparisons and communicate the assumptions behind results.

Your next study starts here

Build the model. Test the strategy. Explain the result.

Start with a load profile, configure the plant and turn your next microgrid question into a structured engineering study.